Monday, July 7, 2008

PhilosopherSsss



A boy is about to go on his first date, and is nervous about what
to talk about. He asks his father for advice. The father
replies: "My son, there are three subjects that always work.
These are food, family, and philosophy."



The boy picks up his date and they go to a soda fountain. Ice
cream sodas in front of them, they stare at each other for a long
time, as the boy's nervousness builds. He remembers his father's
advice, and chooses the first topic. He asks the girl: "Do you
like potato pancakes?" She says "No," and the silence
returns.



After a few more uncomfortable minutes, the boy thinks of his
father's suggestion and turns to the second item on the list. He
asks, "Do you have a brother?" Again, the girl says "No" and
there is silence once again.



The boy then plays his last card. He thinks of his father's
advice and asks the girl the following question: "If you had a
brother, would he like potato pancakes?"






A renowned philosopher was held in high regard by his driver, who
listened in awe at every speech while his boss would easily answer questions
about morality and ethics.



Then one day the driver approached the philosopher and asked if he was
willing to switch roles for the evening's lecture. The philosopher agreed
and, for a while, the driver handled himself remarkably well. When it
came time for questions from the guests, a woman in the back asked, "Is
the epistemological view of the universe still valid in an existentialist
world?"



"That is an extremely simple question," he responded. "So simple, in fact,
that even my driver could answer that, which is exactly what he will do."





A philosopher went into a closet for ten years to contemplate the question,
What is life? When he came out, he went into the street and met an old
colleague, who asked him where in heaven's name he had been all those years.

"In a closet," he repied. "I wanted to know what life really is."

"And have you found an answer?"

"Yes," he replied. "I think it can best be expressed by saying that life is
like a bridge."

"That's all well and good," replied the colleage, "but can you be a little
more explicit? Can you tell me how life is like a bridge?"

"Oh," replied the philosopher after some thought, "maybe you're right;
perhaps life is not like a bridge."




Don't LOOK at anything in a physics lab.

Don't TASTE anything in a chemistry lab.

Don't SMELL anything in a biology lab.

Don't TOUCH anything in a medical lab.

and, most importantly,

Don't LISTEN to anything in a philosophy department.





A philosophy professor walks in to give his class their final. Placing his
chair on his desk the professor instructs the class, "Using every applicable
thing you've learned in this course, prove to me that this chair DOES NOT
EXIST."



So, pencils are writing and erasers are erasing, students are preparing to
embark on novels proving that this chair doesn't exist, except for one
student. He spends thirty seconds writing his answer, then turns his final
in to the astonishment of his peers.



Time goes by, and the day comes when all the students get their final
grades...and to the amazment of the class, the student who wrote for thirty
seconds gets the highest grade in the class.



His answer to the question: "What chair?"





How philosophers do it...


Philosophers do it deeper.

Philosophers do it a posteriori.

Philosophers do it consistently.

Philosophers do it conceptually.

Philosophers do it for pure reasons.

Philosophers do it with their minds.

Philosophers think about doing it.

Philosophers wonder why they did it.



How many philosophers does it take to change a light bulb?

"Hmmm... well there's an interesting question isn't it?"

"Define 'light bulb'..."

"How can you be sure it needs changing?"

Three. One to change it and two to stand around arguing
over whether or not the light bulb exists.




How many Hegelians does it take to change a light bulb?

Two, of course. One stands at one end of the room and
argues that it isn't dark; the other stands at the other end and says
that true light is impossible. This dialectic creates a synthesis which
does the job.



How many Zen masters does it take to change a light bulb?

Two. One to change it, and one not to change it.

Three. One to change it, one not to change it, and one both
to change it and not to change it.



How many existentialists does it take to change a light bulb?

Two. One to change the lightbulb and one to observe how
the lightbulb symbolizes an incandescent beacon of subjectivity in a
netherworld of Cosmic Nothingness.



How many Kuhnian constructionist philosophers of science does it take to
change a light bulb?


You're still thinking in terms of 'incremental change'--what
we really need is paradigm shift...we don't need a bulb with more attributes
added on, we need ubiquitous luminescence.



How many Marxists does it take to change a light bulb?

None. Every light bulb contains the seeds of its own revolution.



EngineeRsss

A mathmatician, a physicist, and an engineer were all given a red rubber ball and told to find the volume.
The mathmatician carefully measured the diameter and evaluated a triple integral.
The physicist filled a beaker with water, put the ball in the water, and measured the total displacement.
The engineer looked up the model and serial numbers in his red-rubber-ball table.


What's the difference between mechanical engineers and civil engineers?
Mechanical engineers build weapons.
Civil engineers build targets.



The great mathematician John Von Neumann was consulted by a group who
was building a rocket ship to send into outer space. When he saw the
incomplete structure, he asked, "Where did you get the plans for this
ship?"
He was told, "We have our own staff of engineers."
He
disdainfully replied: "Engineers! Why, I have complete sewn up the
whole mathematical theory of rocketry. See my paper of 1952."

Well,
the group consulted the 1952 paper, completely scrapped their 10
million dollar structure, and rebuilt the rocket exactly according to
Von Neumann's plans. The minute they launched it, the entire structure
blew up. They angrily called Von Neumann back and said: "We followed
your instructions to the letter. Yet when we started it, it blew up!
Why?"
Von Neumann replied, "Ah, yes; that is technically known as the blow-up problem - I treated that in my paper of 1954."



An engineering student is walking along when a fellow student arrives
on a new bicycle. Impressed, he asks, "Where did you got this beautiful
bicycle?"

"Well," the second engineering student says, "A couple
of days ago I was just walking along when this georgeous blonde pulls
up, hops off the bike, rips off all her clothes, and says 'take what
you want'."

The other engineering student nods and says "Good choice. The clothes probably wouldn't have fit."




Three freshman engineering students were sitting around talking between
classes, when one brought up the question of who designed the human
body.

One of the students insisted that the human body must have
been designed by an electrical engineer because of the perfection of
the nerves and synapses.

Another disagreed, and exclaimed that
it had to have been a mechanical engineer who designed the human body.
The system of levers and pullies is ingeniuos.

"No," the third
student said "your both wrong. The human body was designed by an
architect. Who else but an architect would have put a toxic waste line
through a recreation area?"



Pick-Up Lines to use on Engineering Chicks

I won't stop bugging you until I get the address of your home page.
Let's convert our potential energy to kinetic energy.
Wanna come back to my room and see my 166mhz Pentium?
How about you and I go back to my place and form a covalent bond?
You're sweeter than glucose.
We're as compatible as two similar Power Macintoshes.
Wanna see the programs in my HP-48GX?
Your body has the nicest arc length I've ever seen.
You're hotter than a bunsen burner set to full power!
My love for you is like a concave up function because it is always increasing.



The Dictionary: what engineers say and what they mean by it

Major Technological Breakthrough
Back to the drawing board.
Developed after years of intensive research
It was discovered by accident.
The designs are well within allowable limits
We just made it, stretching a point or two.
Test results were extremely gratifying
It works, and are we surprised!
Customer satisfaction is believed assured
We are so far behind schedule that the customer was happy to get anything at all.
Close project coordination
We should have asked someone else; or, let's spread the responsibility for this.
Project slightly behind original schedule due to unforeseen difficulties
We are working on something else.
The design will be finalized in the next reporting period
We haven't started this job yet, but we've got to say something.
A number of different approaches are being tried
We don't know where we're going, but we're moving.
Extensive effort is being applied on a fresh approach to the problem
We just hired three new guys; we'll let them kick it around for a while.
Preliminary operational tests are inconclusive
The darn thing blew up when we threw the switch.
The entire concept will have to be abandoned
The only guy who understood the thing quit.
Modifications are underway to correct certain minor difficulties
We threw the whole thing out and are starting from scratch.
Essentially complete.
Half done.
We predict...
We hope to God!
Drawing release is lagging.
Not a single drawing exists.
Risk is high, but acceptable.
100 to 1 odds, or with 10 times the budget and 10 times the manpower, we may
have a 50/50 chance.

Serious, but not insurmountables, problems.
It will take a miracle. God should be the program manager.
Not well defined.
Nobody has thought about it.
Requires further analysis and management attention.
Totally out of control.
The project is designed for high availability.
Malfunctions will be blamed on the operators mistakes.
This project has low maintenance requirements.
We wouldn't let the technicians change a light bulb, much less fool around with our baby.
The software is being developed without excessive process overhead.
The documentation will be written in clear and lucid Chinese.
The delivery is scheduled for the last quater of next year.
This leaves us plenty of time to decide who to blame for it being late.